It seems to me that, as this excellent article from CNN suggests – http://www.cnn.com/2013/01/31/politics/gun-language/index.html?hpt=hp_c1 – the heart of the gun control/gun rights argument might lie in the issues of whether or not we have control over our own lives. As the article correctly points out, our individual rights are something that we cherish as Americans.
However, I have to wonder – again, in keeping with the article’s focus on the power of words – if the issue of control is interpreted very differently for some of us than it is for others. I’m specifically thinking that, as a woman, control over my own life involves a whole different set of decisions than it may involve for men. Many, many years ago – decades ago – I was in a highly restrictive marriage, where I was literally told, in these specific words, “What’s yours is mine and what’s mine is mine,” and “I don’t like you seeing those people; you need to stop.” One evening when a girlfriend and I got adventurous and cut my long hair to chin length, the reaction was complete disapproval because, after all, he said, “I’m the one who has to look at you.”
So control over my own life, to me, has meant the ability to make personal choices about my life. It’s meant being able to support myself (and for several years in there, my children) and control my own finances; it’s meant choosing when and where I go out, and with whom I will associate; it’s meant following my own career path because it’s fun and I enjoy it; it’s meant being able to go to a movie or the symphony or some other spare-time activity without risking stern disapproval.
Then there are the larger issues for all women: do I take the chance of having a great time with friends in a bistro or a bar until 2 a.m. when it closes, and walking even a block down a darkened street at that time of night? Do I take the risk of meeting a stranger online and agreeing to a date? I am certainly more afraid of the violence some men show toward women than I am of guns.
The CNN article says, “…Americans don’t like the idea of the government ‘controlling’ many of their decisions.” In my life, as woman, the government hasn’t been the main problem.
However, it is for men. I believe (you may disagree, of course) that men’s need to control comes partly through biology – they are, after all, hard-wired for some of this – as well as the roles we have assigned them in most societies of being providers and protectors. I also believe that many men feel out of control a great deal of the time by the forces governing their lives, and that they might trace many of those forces back to the government (correctly or not). Losing a job during this long recession, for example, has made many a man feel helpless and inadequate when it comes to providing for his family. Many young men in the urban areas of our country feel helpless when it comes to needing a sense of home, a sense of belonging, a sense of community – and they therefore turn to gangs and to guns as a way of being in control.
There is also another anthropological point of view I hold about this, which we almost never talk about: while it’s completely obvious when a girl becomes a woman – her biology tells her so – it’s not so obvious when a boy becomes a man. In many, many other societies, there are traditions of initiating young boys into manhood. They are often very harsh traditions involving the ability to endure pain as well as the development of skills for hunting and the like. But once initiated, a boy is celebrated as a man.
We have nothing in this country that celebrates our boys becoming men; we don’t even celebrate what it is to be a man, unless it’s on the violence of the football field (I watch the game, too, but you have to admit it’s violent) or through the violence of war. That’s how we seem to define and celebrate manhood in this country.
Young boys and young men need strong physical activity; they are hard-wired for that, too. I raised one son and I have four grandsons. We know this; we know it’s why young boys are “fidget midgets” in elementary school and can barely sit still. We know they need to test themselves; we know they need to be supported and celebrated and to have a strong definition of what it is to be a man – a definition that means something besides violence.
Why don’t we do this? Why do we then wonder why so many young men feel so out of control? Why aren’t we celebrating men’s special mental, emotional and physical strengths, their special goodness, and their special kindness? Why are we constantly viewing television commercials that portray men as the biggest dumbbells who ever walked the planet?
We have a lot of growing up to do as a society, and it seems to me that one of the key places to start is in creating a path to manhood for our boys, celebrating and welcoming them when they get there. Perhaps one of the consequences will be far less need for the false sense of control that guns provide; perhaps the right to own a gun will become much more proportionate to the right we all have to live in a society that has not become an armed camp.
You wrote:
“… creating a path to manhood for our boys, celebrating and welcoming them when they get there.”
Send a check to the Boy Scouts of America please.
And wrote:
“Perhaps one of the consequences will be far less need for the false sense of control that guns provide;”
There is nothing “false” about the control that a loaded handgun gives a person to defend herself and her loved ones from the violent and insane. That control is especially not “false” if you devote a little time and energy in getting training to use one.
I just passed a course to carry a concealed handgun in Texas. When I actually get the license it will not produce any “false” security.
And finally wrote:
“…the right we all have to live in a society that has not become an armed camp.”
Who told you that you have that right? They lied. Your right to live in a safe society is directly proportional to your willingness to defend it. The many people now who have legally qualified to carry concealed handguns in public have that right. They have earned it.
You have not, unless you are one of them.
Someone in my family has defended our country in every major war it has fought since 1812. We have earned it. But freedom is only one generation of fools away from extinction. We don’t have to worry about government taking away our freedom. We have a whole generation that thinks they have “rights” they have not defended and they will give up their freedom in the hope that government will take care of them. It is a vain hope.
lwk
Who Needs An Assault Rifle?
http://free2beinamerica2.wordpress.com/2012/12/19/who-needs-an-assault-rifle/
I’m afraid I’m going to one-up you here on part of this: My ancestors started fighting for this country in the Revolutionary War, and continued up through World War II. In my lifetime, my former husband fought in Southeast Asia during Viet Nam. My son was in the Air Force for eight years, and then in the Army; he’s been to Saudi Arabia, Egypt and South Korea. I run a web site for service members and veterans who have been affected by the mandatory anthrax vaccine. I’ve been, at various times in my life, the daughter, wife and mother of men serving our country.
And you are beyond ignorant to say or even think that the families of our service members are not also sacrificing for our country. You are beyond ignorant to think that we take our freedoms for granted.
The point you seem to blithely miss is that if our government gets to the point where it takes away guns from those who are legally able to own guns, it’s all too late anyway. Fear creates its own reality; you do not seem to recognize this. When you react to everything in your life with fear of being attacked, you will, at some point, become attacked. The danger of everyone owning guns is that more people – not fewer people – will die at the hands of guns. The danger of everyone owning guns is that guns can be turned on you as quickly as you might try to use yours – that’s why I call it a false sense of control.
This past week, one particular death really brought that point home: former Navy Seal sniper Chris Kyle, fully armed, and arguably one of the most capable people in the world in terms of his ability to protect himself from a gun – couldn’t.
You wrote:
“Fear creates its own reality; you do not seem to recognize this. When you react to everything in your life with fear of being attacked, you will, at some point, become attacked.”
I don’t think I am reacting with fear. If you live in certain areas it is wise to stockpile some supplies for emergencies, but you don’t go around every day afraid, seeing every dark cloud on the horizon as an approaching hurricane. I am familiar with the belief, held by some, that we attract certain things to ourselves by what we think or feel. My view is more along the line of karma. We get largely what we deserve.
And wrote:
“The danger of everyone owning guns is that more people – not fewer people – will die at the hands of guns.”
A more important statistic is how many people die at the hands of others. The U.K. has largely banned most firearms yet they still manage to kill each other at about the same rate as the did before. If people have guns sometimes they chose that as the method to commit suicide. If they don’t have guns they often find other ways.
The fact is that those areas with the highest concentration of guns in this country are often the most peaceful. On the other hand, areas like Chicago have nearly complete bans on legal firearms but very high murder rates. The criminals still get guns of course, hardly any law abiding citizen can own one for self defense.
The real question is how many people will die if you could take guns away. Given that the research of Dr. Gary Kleck shows Americans defending themselves with firearms over two millions times a year should give you pause to consider how much crime, rape, and murder is prevented by firearms compared to the number of people who die by firearms, and many of those would die regardless by other means if guns were not there.
And wrote:
“The danger of everyone owning guns is that guns can be turned on you as quickly as you might try to use yours – that’s why I call it a false sense of control.”
No one is in control of everything. Life is a calculated risk. If you chose to own a firearm it is wise to get training, and to seriously consider how you might use it, or if you would use it. In that regards you might find the book “On Killing” by Lt. Col. Dave Grossman interesting. His conclusions are not anything most people expect. Certainly nothing “macho,” in fact very much the opposite.
And wrote:
“This past week, one particular death really brought that point home: former Navy Seal sniper Chris Kyle, fully armed, and arguably one of the most capable people in the world in terms of his ability to protect himself from a gun – couldn’t.”
I will be interested to find out what happened. If you read history you might know that the outlaw Jesse James was killed by a coward who shot him in the back. Same story for “Wild Bill” Hickok. Like I said earlier, life is always a calculated risk, and I don’t think you draw to yourself what you think of, but rather what you ultimately deserve. But that is largely a conversation beyond the bounds of our current one.
By the way, I am a Vietnam Veteran, and my youngest son is an infantry machine gunner in the Marines.
lwk
http://free2beinamerica2.wordpress.com